harriyott.com

Monday, June 02, 2008

Re-inventing the toll

One of the side-effects of being a developer is that I often find myself "debugging" things outside of the IDE, or the computer itself. Recently I went somewhere that involved driving across the Dartford crossing on the M25*. There's a tunnel under the River Thames for northbound traffic, and a huge bridge for southbound traffic. There are toll gates for both directions south of the river.

As I was in a long, southbound queue (caused by the toll) on my return journey, I started thinking about why there were two tolls in operation at the same time, and two resultant traffic jams, and what to do about it. I think I've come up with a way to ease the jams.

The obvious first choice is to dispense with the tolls altogether, since the bridge paid for itself in 2003. The government aren't going to do that though.

I reckon that almost everyone that uses the bridge in one direction uses it again in the opposite direction very shortly afterwards. In my case, it was about 7 hours after. Very few people make journeys from their home or place of work and don't return via the same route in the opposite direction.

On my journey, I had two toll transactions, of £1 each way. I think it would be better to have one transaction of £2 instead, that would cover both journeys. In this way, one set of tolls could be closed, and allow traffic to flow freely through, removing one traffic jam altogether.

Depending on the traffic flow, the tolls could be changed over to reduce an extremely long tailback. If this happened in the middle of the day, then some people may have to pay twice, and others nothing at all. Although this doesn't sound fair, it should even out over time.

Should I suggest this to Boris, or is it a silly idea?

* Actually, it isn't the M25 at the crossing, it's the A282. I presume this is so that learner drivers can cross the river without going into town, as they're not allowed on motorways.

4 Comments:

Blogger Craig said...

A similar situation exists at The Forth Road Bridge.

A few years ago the southbound toll booths were removed leaving a the northbound drivers to pay the toll - yes, it was doubled to 80p, then rose to £1 very quickly. In theory, removal of the bottleneck southbound (tolls) would mean shorter southbound travel times. Sadly not so - the council left traffic lights on a slip road thus causing southbound traffic in the left-hand lane to build up on to the bridge. Traffic in the right-hand lane then started "sneaking in", thus causing a build up of traffic in both lanes. We're now in a position southbound, where all traffic can avoid the slip road...yet still traffic builds up southbound. For miles there are two lanes of traffic approaching the bridge and now there are 3-4 lanes leaving the bridge...yet still the trafic builds up.

Northbound saw the tolls removed completely, a waste of £13m for the installation of the toll plaza a couple of years ago...Anyway, we now have no tolls in either direction, yet still the queues form.

It's more of a "people thing" than a process thing - educating the drivers is a mammoth task. The process thing (toll and booths) has been removed...it's time to work on driver education.

June 02, 2008 10:42 AM  
Blogger Sven Latham said...

The Severn crossings do this as well. You pay to enter Wales but it's free to get back to England.

"I presume this is so that learner drivers can cross the river without going into town" ... I believe this is correct, and applies generally for all non-motorway traffic to get across the bridge, since the next most-easterly crossings are (I think) Woolwich Ferry and Rotherhithe Tunnel.

I wonder though if you removed the pinch-point of the tolls whether the capacity of the roads further along are up to the task, or whether the congestion would simply be moved a few hundred yards?

Adding a local note, the Gosport-Portsmouth ferry used to operate on a return ticket basis (tickets only checked travelling to Pompey) but reverted a few years ago. I've heard (but don't know how true this is) that this was because of the large numbers of sailors who'd take advantage of this to travel to Gosport after landing at port - how they got back to Pompey I don't know. Still, it's interesting that they've reverted for one reason or another.

June 02, 2008 11:07 AM  
Anonymous Colin Angus Mackay said...

@craig Do you think that the removal of the tolls has increased the amount of traffic on the Bridge? Hence the continuation of jams. And if that has happened, is there any indication of an even shorter life-span for the bridge?

June 02, 2008 12:24 PM  
Anonymous Matt Taylor said...

I think the downfall in your idea is that it's logical! I really didn't know about the crossing being the A282 - again, very logical but I imagine both the tunnel and the bridge would be extremely intimidating for most learner drivers.

Picking up on Sven's comment about the Severn crossing; it always struck me that they would have made more money charging people to get out of Wales rather than to get in? :)

June 03, 2008 8:46 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home