harriyott.com

Friday, September 15, 2006

Firewall: the movie

Every now and again, my wife and I like to rent a film. I like to exasperate Julia by pointing out the technological errors, and explaining why things wouldn't happen like that. Last night we watched Firewall, which disappointingly didn't mention any firewalls. As a film, it was generally ok, but the were a few there's-no-way-that-would-work bits that I spotted (in ascending order of ridiculousness):

  1. There is no way that the head of security for a bank would use a weak password such as "Lark" for his alarm system. Especially as "Lark" is the name of his boat.

  2. There is the standard "wireless internet everywhere" thing. I could accept that the baddies might have a satellite link, but the secretary's personal laptop wouldn't. I'd be surprised if they even had phone coverage in the remote house by the lake, let alone being able to track the dog's GPS collar on a website.

  3. Jack cracking into the baddies' Cayman Islands bank account and removing $100 million from a bank terminal. I could accept that he might be able to reverse a transfer within a certain time period, but not that he could get into a specific account, and so quickly.

  4. Taking apart a fax machine and plugging the scanning roller into an iPod, and then sticking it to a monitor, and recording a fast moving set of numbers as they scroll up the monitor onto the iPod is just ridiculous. Especially as it worked the first (and only) time, that the data was flashing up on the screen. Goodness, I can't even read and then parse a line of text from a file right first time!


It seems that someone else has spotted a network goof too. Still at least they didn't try to upload a virus from a Mac to a spaceship.

Oh, if anyone can show me how this fax / iPod thing being done like it was in the film, I'll write out this blog post by hand onto a sheet of paper, and eat it. And this extra sentence, just to make it take a bit longer. And I'll video myself doing it and post it to YouTube.

So why is it that Hollywood can spend millions on getting top-notch actors and effects, and won't consider having a quick chat with a genius like Scott Hanselman? (Mmm. Maybe he's not cynical enough - perhaps Mike Gunderloy?). You know what? I bet they wouldn't charge much more than about ten grand a film to skim through the script and show them where they're going wrong. The film would be better, and I wouldn't annoy Julia so much.

[Tags: ]

5 Comments:

Anonymous said...

I admit there were a few flaws, but its more technically accurate than other files (eg The Net). The scanner thing was the only real issue i had with it, i didnt notice the IP address difference between the rule and the offending ip address, nor did i actually stop to think that they were private 'non routable' (over the internet), i was dumbfounded to see that a legitimate IP was used (4 octets all less than 255). The nitpickers entry you linked to was partly wrong though, while 0.0.0.255 is not a valid subnet mask it is a very valid wildcard mask, which is what access control lists on cisco routers use, so that is a technical point for the movie.

So my only real issue is the scanner and now the private ip addresses they used, of course that other guy was right it would stop false positives :)

Tim

September 19, 2006 12:05 AM  
Simon said...

Hi Tim,

Thanks for your comment. I didn't spot any of the network thing at all, so you've done better than me. I haven't seen "The Net" since it first came out. I might watch it again, just to see!

September 19, 2006 8:48 AM  
Anonymous said...

Hi Simon,

I have a feeling I've come across your blog before, actually. The books page rang a distant bell.

Anyhow, an eye for an eye, a comment for a comment.

On topic: TV programmes can grate too. I almost grind my teeth flat every time they "zoom in and enhance" a crappy CCTV photo on CSI. There was the holographic display on Bones, too.

September 22, 2006 10:42 PM  
Simon said...

Oh yeah definitely. That annoys me too. It's quite a common one I think.

September 22, 2006 10:50 PM  
Anonymous said...

hey guys do you know the name of the software they were using to monitor the network. When he sent the email and the network started to go down he had another pc with monitor software, looked like in an outlook GUI, does naybody know the name of that software he was using please let me know.

email me at jonathan184@hotmail.com
Thanks

June 02, 2007 5:07 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home